![]() ![]() I had thought when they came out with X Transform they had dropped the developer for Windows boxes. So they came out with X Transformer so you could use most of the features and generate a DNG you could use with other developers. They started working on it for Windows, but it must have been a lot more work than first thought. You would have to Email Brian but I know at one time the Windows users were whining because the developer was only available on the Mac. I also thought that Iridient Transformer was PC compatible. I hadn't tried it with my X3F's but will. Iridient does a masterful job with my Fuji RAF's. The only down side for some will be - the developer is only available for the Mac. It has nice highlight recovery.Īll and all a nice package especially considering it is a one man company. It has indecent control of shadows, midtowns and highlights. It has deconvolution sharpening for caused where diffraction sets in or small camera movement. It has features that cannot not be found elsewhere. It is the only package that does the Fuji X-Trans right. I'm impressed with it.Iridient is very good. If you don't have access to a Mac, C1 is worth trying. ![]() The key is to get the sharpening close in X-Transformer first so you don't have to do much in LR. Developer? No comparison, Iridient is better. When comparing these settings in LR to results using Iridient to import, the worms never fully go away in foliage and other certain situations regardless of which one you use, but the results are nearly identical.ĭepends on Iridient. If it's a critical photo, I'm using something other than Lightroom. But even then, Lightroom is not doing a good job.īottom line, LR isn't capable of producing the kind of results on the 24Mp x-trans sensors that C1 and Iridient Developer are. Better results can be had by setting it very low - under 15 or even under 10 and sharpening from there. I keep seeing it hinted at here and didn't realize where it came from. Most of the time, and that's really always for me, it enhances and increases wormy artifacts. I don't recommend the detail method seen in the link above. I tried moving the detail slider between 85 and 100, wormy artifacts are still present at 3:1 and the color differences still make Iridient worth using in a Fuji workflow. There's almost no difference once you do that.ĭoing that, the results are extremely different than C1 and Iridient. It's well known that LR's detail slider should be set between 85 to 100 as it changes the sharpening algorithm and gives results similar to Iridient and C1. The program produces images that can go straight to jpegs without additional tweaks in LR or PS. Magic Carpet es un videojuego de disparos en primera persona desarrollado por la empresa Bullfrog en 1994.Magic Carpet konnte den Spielverlauf in Echtzeit stereoskopisch als Rot-Cyan Anaglyphenbild oder nach dem Single Image. I just tried the latest version of Iridient developer ver.3.2 and am very impressed with how it handles Merrill file and the ability of the program to process the DNG files from the Quattro cameras. Iridient Sharpening (v3 Detail+ X-Trans, Iridient Reveal, No sliders were moved from default) Iridient developer raf preview open library. Imported RAF, sharpened using each program All of these photos have just been sharpened their respective programs. I can't believe the color/contrast differences before editing any of those sliders. Just another crop of the same photo to show the color difference. The Iridient file looks like it has already been edited, but this is just the RAW processor at work.Īt 3:1 we can see the wormy artifacts in the LR file much more so than in the Iridient file. Personally, I’ve avoided migrating my main catalogue to Lightroom 6, 1 but with this last release of Lightroom, Adobe claims improvements to at least. A lot has been blogged and tweeted about Lightroom 6’s new features. Please note the color differences in the sky and building. This is a detailed look at Adobe’s latest June 2015 release of Lightroom (6.1 / CC 2015.1), and how it compares with 5.7. Both images are similar sharpness and at 1:1 wormy artifacts aren't a big issue. These are RAF files straight out of camera and thrown into each program and sharpened. No color/contrast editing has been applied for these images. Please don't start a Fuji vs Sony flame war, this isn't the purpose of this thread. I have since left Fuji for Sony for various reasons but I figured this post might help someone. I am also really surprised at how Iridient processes the RAF file. I used to think this was only for foliage but the wormy artifacts can start affect any image. I am sure most people know by now that LR doesn't handle RAF files too well. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |